A great deal of confusion exists in the church over the definition of
legalism. There are those who conclude that a legalist is someone who "keeps the commandments." This cannot be
legalism since the Bible commends those who keep God’s commandments. Jesus said, “If you love me, you will keep
My commandments” (John 14:15). Others imagine that a legalist is a person who works at keeping God’s law. Such
a person is not a legalist since the psalmist extols the beauty and necessity of a love for God’s law
(Psalm 119)....
The nomination of Judge John Roberts to sit on the Supreme Court has
reopened a bitter cultural divide in America, and the Senate confirmation hearings in September may exhibit
more of the partisan rancor that characterized the Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas hearings.
It’s sad that so many Americans see their freedoms as dependent on a single Supreme Court justice.
Federal judges were never meant to wield the tremendous power that they do in modern America.
Our Founders would find it inconceivable that a handful of unelected, unaccountable federal judges
can decide social policy for the entire nation...
At least that's what the Founding Fathers believed. Which is why they would not ratify the U.S.
Constitution -- and thus establish a centralized national government -- without including in that same
document a list of limitations on centralized power. That list of limitations is called the Bill of Rights,
and it consists of the first Ten Amendments to the Constitution.
The First Amendment to the Constitution has always been the shining jewel in the Founders' crown. The
freedoms guaranteed there, especially regarding religion and the press, have been an example to humankind
for over 200 years.
This should be a simple lesson in civics. But over the last 60 years or so the U.S. Supreme Court has
issued rulings in one particular area -- church-state cases -- that have so muddled the simplicity of the
First Amendment as to cause ordinary Americans to despair of understanding its meaning. The most recent high
court rulings on public displays of the Ten Commandments -- which some even consider to be
contradictory -- manifested this legal confusion...
In a godly society, the state would be small and limited in power. In Israel, God made no allowances for a property tax or an income tax. The predicted demands of the state for a tenth (equal to the social tithe due to God) was considered a sign of oppression (1 Sam. 8:15-17). The poll or head tax (Ex. 30:11-16; Num. 1:1-3) was a uniform tax on each adult male that was to finance the necessary administration of justice and defense. Because it was uniform, and not progressive, it had to be small enough that all could afford it. God's taxation required a limited funding for a limited state.
NO JOKE,
It reminds me of a joke I heard in Zambia. "The South African Ambassador was being introduced to the Zambian Minister of Naval Affairs. The SA Ambassador laughed and said 'You can't have a Minister of Naval Affairs - Zambia is a land locked country!'
'Well', responded the Zambian 'in South Africa you have a Ministry of Justice!'"
Indeed, it seems quite inappropriate that we in South Africa have a Ministry of Safety and Security. Crime and violence would be a more accurate description.
Protecting
America's freedoms for over 40 years through education and
activism.
JUPITER PRESBYTERIAN and
REFORMED COVENANT CHURCH
110 Park Street, Jupiter, FL 33458
For information, JPRCC: mailto:jprcc@adelphia.net
Phone: Elder Ron Bull (561) 745-2429